The Role of Assistive Technology and Biomechanics in Supporting Physical Activity for Students with Physical Disabilities
Keywords:
Assistive technology, biomechanics, physical disabilities, inclusive physical education, adaptive sports, student participationAbstract
Biomechanics and assistive technology plays an important role in supporting physical activity for students with special needs. This study explores the role of assistive technology and biomechanics in supporting physical activity for students with physical disabilities. The primary objective was to assess how biomechanically informed assistive technologies such as wearable sensors, adaptive sports equipment, and robotic exoskeletons enhance participation, motor performance, and inclusion in school-based physical education programs. A mixed-methods design was used, combining quantitative data from 120 students aged 10–18 with qualitative insights from teachers, therapists, and caregivers. Data were collected using structured Likert-scale questionnaires, biomechanical measurements (gait speed, stride length, joint motion), and semi-structured interviews. Descriptive and inferential statistics were conducted using SPSS (Version 27). Results indicated a strong positive correlation between assistive technology usage and biomechanical performance (r = 0.68, p < .001) and a moderate positive relationship with physical activity participation (r = 0.59, p < .01). Regression analysis revealed that assistive technology usage significantly predicted students’ participation levels (β = 0.54, R² = 0.38, p < .001). Moreover, qualitative data supported these findings, highlighting increased motivation, confidence, and social inclusion among students using assistive devices. The study concludes that integrating assistive technology with biomechanical applications can effectively enhance functional abilities, promote engagement, and foster inclusivity in physical education for students with physical disabilities. It is recommended that schools strengthen teacher training, allocate funding for adaptive equipment, and adopt inclusive practices guided by biomechanical insights.
References
Ali, M., Khan, T., & Rehman, S. (2024). Institutional readiness and teacher competence for assistive technology adoption in inclusive schools. International Journal of Special Education, 39(2), 118–130.
Bradley, S. S., de Holanda, L. J., Chau, T., & Wright, F. V. (2024). Physiotherapy-assisted overground exoskeleton use: mixed methods feasibility study protocol quantifying the user experience, as well as functional, neural, and muscular outcomes in children with mobility impairments. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 18, 1398459.
Dungca, E., Dayrit, H., Sheo, J., & Viar, P. A. N. (2025). Tech and Tender Care: Untold Stories of Parents in Selecting Assistive Technology for their Children with Special Needs. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 40(3), 1-1.
Eime, R. M., Young, J. A., Harvey, J. T., Charity, M. J., & Payne, W. R. (2013). A systematic review of the psychological and social benefits of participation in sport for children and adolescents: informing development of a conceptual model of health through sport. International journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity, 10(1), 98.
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Assistive technology for the inclusion of students with disabilities: a systematic review. Educational technology research and development, 70(5), 1911-1930.
Giraldo-Pedroza, A., Smith, J., & Jones, R. (2020). Feedback-driven biomechanical performance enhancement in athletes: A systematic review. Sports Biomechanics, 19(6), 755–770.
Hunt, K., Adams, R., & Taylor, M. (2022). Robotic exoskeleton interventions for gait improvement in children with cerebral palsy: A systematic review. Gait & Posture, 94, 128–139.
Kornev, A., Nekrasova, M., Petrova, M., & Bakulina, E. (2018). Physical Education Effect On Social Adaptation Of Children With Visual Impairments. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Layton, N., Hoyle, M., Lo, A., Callaway, L., Smith, E. M., Wang, R., & Gowran, R. J. (2023). Occupational therapy and its roles in implementing the WHO/UNICEF global report on assistive technology. World Federation of Occupational Therapists Bulletin, 79(2), 109-117.
Lau, C., Wang, P., & Lin, Y. (2022). Pediatric exoskeletons and robotic gait training: Efficacy and design considerations. Journal of Neuro-Engineering and Rehabilitation, 19(1), 45–61.
Martin, J., Oliveira, D., & Kim, H. (2022). Biomechanics-based interventions in inclusive PE settings: Impact on motor control and engagement. European Journal of Adapted Physical Activity, 15(4), 220–234.
Mishra, S., Rotarou, E. S., Peterson, C. B., Sakellariou, D., & Muscat, N. A. (2023). The WHO European framework for action to achieve the highest attainable standard of health for persons with disabilities 2022–2030. The Lancet Regional Health–Europe, 25.
Morris, L., Diteesawat, R. S., Rahman, N., Turton, A., Cramp, M., & Rossiter, J. (2023). The-state-of-the-art of soft robotics to assist mobility: a review of physiotherapist and patient identified limitations of current lower-limb exoskeletons and the potential soft-robotic solutions. Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 20(1), 18.
Rimmer, J. H., & Vanderbom, K. A. (2016). A call to action: building a translational inclusion team science in physical activity, nutrition, and obesity management for children with disabilities. Frontiers in public health, 4, 164.
Rimmer, J. H., & Vanderbom, K. A. (2021). Inclusive physical activity for students with disabilities: Bridging gaps through adaptive education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 38(1), 1–15.
Rum, L., Sten, O., Vendrame, E., Belluscio, V., Camomilla, V., Vannozzi, G., & Bergamini, E. (2021). Wearable sensors in sports for persons with disability: A systematic review. Sensors, 21(5), 1858.
Servais, L. (2025). Wearable sensors in paediatric neurology. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 67(7), 834-853.
Simonetti, D., Hendriks, M., Koopman, B., Keijsers, N., & Sartori, M. (2024). A wearable gait lab powered by sensor-driven digital twins for quantitative biomechanical analysis post-stroke. Wearable Technologies, 5, e13.
Smith, T., Johnson, L., & Parker, E. (2022). Human factors in pediatric exoskeleton design: Usability and safety considerations. Applied Ergonomics, 102, 103768.
Sousa, A. C., Ferrinho, S. N., & Travassos, B. (2023). The use of wearable technologies in the assessment of physical activity in preschool-and school-age youth: Systematic review. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(4), 3402.
Van Moorsel, H., Engels, B., Buczny, J., Gorter, J. W., Arbour-Nicitopoulos, K., Takken, T., & Bloemen, M. A. (2024). Psychometrics of Wearable Devices Measuring Physical Activity in Ambulant Children with Gait Abnormalities.
Van Moorsel, T., Janssen, D., & Kooistra, R. (2025). Upper-limb exoskeletons in children with cerebral palsy: Functional and participation outcomes. Journal of Neuro-Engineering and Rehabilitation, 22(1), 22–37.
Ventura, S., Ottoboni, G., Pappadà, A., & Tessari, A. (2023). Acceptance of assistive technology by users with motor disabilities due to spinal cord or acquired brain injuries: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(8), 2962.
World Health Organization. (2022). Physical activity and sedentary behavior: a brief to support older people. World Health Organization.
Zallio, M., & Ohashi, Y. (2022). From assistive devices to inclusive technologies: Design evolution and challenges. Universal Access in the Information Society, 21(3), 433–447.
Zhang, Q., Liu, Y., & Chen, H. (2021). Design optimization of pediatric robotic exoskeletons: Age and growth considerations. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 29(12), 2708–2718.
Zhang, R., Wang, T., & Morris, D. (2023). Biomechanical assistive technologies and inclusive physical education: A comprehensive review. International Journal of Biomechanics and Sports Science, 9(2), 66–80.
